Saturday, March 24, 2012

Nice one, Al

Al Sharpton (the reverend) wrote an article for the Huff Post and this was the first sentence of the second paragraph:

Today, Black (and Latino) youth are routinely targeted, profiled and 'mistakenly' shot by those sworn to serve and protect us (i.e. Sean Bell).


Routinely? Really? ROUTINELY shot? Dude...

I couldn't read any further because I had to tend to the paper cut I got from his race card.

Friday, March 16, 2012

Wearing a Cross at Work, soon to be outlawed in UK



                                                                         

Isn't it nice to know that in the UK it is permissable and government protected for Muslim women to wear their headdresses but if you are a christian you have no right to wear a cruxifix at your workplace?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/borisjohnson/9137523/Its-a-huge-mistake-to-forbid-a-tiny-act-of-Christian-worship.html

How about if you run a small Bed & Breakfast and have a moral/religious conviction that two people, who aren't married to each other, shouldn't sleep together in one of the rooms in YOUR Bed and Breakfast?  The UK (the US as well) also says that you can't DISCRIMINATE in deciding who you let rent a room from you.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304692804577283380383835556.html

The first issue, the cross.  Utter idiocy.  If my employer has the legal right to tell me that I can't wear a small token of my faith around my neck then Western Civilization is over with.

The second issue.  More difficult.  I personally believe that if I own something and use that something to provide a service to the public why should I not be able to discriminate as to who I let use whatever it is that I own?  Let the Free Market determine if I succeed or not.  That of course runs into Equal Rights/Civil Rights and other issues.  So there is less of a easy answer for that issue.  To be honest I'm perplexed about it. 
Other thoughts?



Monday, March 12, 2012

Voter ID

It baffles me that anyone would oppose the idea of having to present identification when voting. The fact that the whole Voter ID issue has blown up like it has just shows how screwed up our country really is when it comes to accomplishing even the simplest of tasks. Casting a vote is a guaranteed right to all U.S. citizens. Key term there being U.S. Citizen. Not illegal immigrants, dead people, or anyone else.

Democrats complain that requiring Voter ID is a "voting tax" and that it "discriminates against minorities" and so on. I say BS. A single vote could potentially decide who will be our next member of congress, our next governor, or even our next president. It's that important.

You can't even get a library card without some kind of ID, and despite the way I feel about the importance of books, I am pretty sure that the ability to decide who becomes the next POTUS may be just a tad more important.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Rush and the Slut Comment

Rush Limbaugh.  Slut.  Congressional Committee.  Liberal Media.  College Coed.

Good job Rush.  You just helped Obama raise another few million dollars for his run to "fundamentally change American" after he wins another term. 

Even though technically he didn't call her a slut, the inference was there.  Even though your logic was correct, not very smart to say it at this point in the election cycle.
Even though I agree with your assertions about the underlying problem, for once you should have kept your mouth shut. 

No way you win against a cute, college coed, espousing fundamental liberal beliefs in the mainstream media shark tank.

You should have called her "ignorant" or "irresponsible".  You should not have inferred that she was a slut.

Left Freaks Out Over My Fluke Remarks


BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Oh, yeah, I'm gonna deal with this. I'm gonna deal with it. I think this is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. The left has been thrown into an outright conniption fit! This is "phony soldiers" times ten. Oh, ten times worse than phony soldiers. The reaction that they are having to what I said yesterday about Susan Fluke -- or Sandra Fluke, whatever her name is -- the Georgetown student who went before a congressional committee and said she's having so much sex, she's going broke buying contraceptives and wants us to buy them. I said, "Well, what would you call someone who wants us to pay for her to have sex? What would you call that woman? You'd call 'em a slut, a prostitute or whatever."
That has sent them into orbit! Pelosi's in orbit and Sheila Jackson Lee. They're still talking about it on the House floor. The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee sent out an immediate fundraising letter with a picture making me look like Dracula. I mean it is... (laughing) I've got the original story here that all this feeds off of, so all of you sit tight. Look, at least I didn't call her "a woman driver," and I'll tell you this, you people on the left: I'll happily buy her all the aspirin she wants. Snerdley, you would agree. We would happily buy Sandra Fluke all the aspirin she wants. What could that possibly cost. But contraceptives? So much sex at Georgetown?
The headline: "Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control, Student Tells Pelosi Hearing Touting Freebie Mandate -- A Georgetown co-ed told Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex that they’re going broke, so you and I should pay for their birth control." Cybercast News Service. So what would you call that? So I called it what it is. And, bam, boy, you nail these people with the truth! So I'm offering a compromise today. I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want. Well, here's the thing about that. Where are all these guys?
Is it any wonder, Clinton wanted to go to this law school and why Hillary went to Wellesley? Is it any wonder? Where are the guys here? Do they not have a role here? We assume they're having sex with guys. (interruption) Well, we're talking about birth control, Snerdley. So you gotta assume having sex with guys. So, do they not have some responsibility? (interruption) Well, two women... I have to ask sex expert Snerdley on this, but I'm not aware that two women without another device can get pregnant on their own using naturally endowed accoutrements. I don't think times have changed that much. (chuckles)
Now, I am 61. Maybe something I haven't heard about that two women together would need contraception. That's a whole new ball game if that's the case. But I don't think we're talking about that. So it means there are men involved and that would mean there's some responsibility on the part of the men. Do they not have condoms? Why don't these women go ask the men to buy them contraception? Why go before a congressional committee and demand that all of us -- because they want to have sex any time, as many times and as often as they want, with as many partners as they want -- should pay for it? Whatever, no limits on this. I mean, they're going broke having to buy contraception! They're getting back-alley pills, folks. That's what this leads up to.
I want to go back and get this out of the way 'cause I'm sure that there is voluminous tune-in today to hear about this controversy that has arisen with my blunt talk about Sandra Fluke.  We've run some numbers on this.  According to Planned Parenthood -- and they should know -- birth control pills cost between $15 to $50 a month.  So, at most, that would be $600 a year.  What is Sandra Fluke buying?  We then -- I didn't do this, but a member of the staff well-versed in these matters went to Amazon to check the purchase of condoms.  And essentially what we found is that you could buy the equivalent of using five condoms a day for $953, and if you paid for it at once you could get free shipping.  And everybody's in a hurry here.  So free shipping would matter.  Nine hundred fifty-three dollars.  So Planned Parenthood, $600 bucks a year.  Condoms, $953 a year.
Up on Capitol Hill at Pelosi's hearing, thousands of dollars a year.  But they want it free.  They want the contraception free.  I know condoms are free, if you know where to go get 'em.  I don't know where to go get 'em free but Snerdley assures me that they're free.  (interruption) There is an iPhone AP to find free condoms?  For New York City.  Well, cool, okay, there you go.  So we're not even talking $953 with free shipping.  Keep that in mind while we're listening to this thousands and thousands of dollars in taxpayer dollars to satisfy the sexual habits of female law students at Georgetown.
Now, here's the story that started all this.  It's by a guy name Craig Bannister at Cybercast News Service: "A Georgetown co-ed told Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex that they’re going broke, so you and I should pay for their birth control.  Speaking at a hearing held by Pelosi to tout Pres. Obama’s mandate that virtually every health insurance plan cover the full cost of contraception and abortion-inducing products, Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke said that it’s too expensive to have sex in law school without mandated insurance coverage. Apparently, four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception, Fluke's research shows." And of course what's sex if the ends aren't meeting?
But Fluke presented research to the committee: four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception. Have you heard of anything more ridiculous?  This is flat-out thievery.  It's outright ridiculous that taxpayers should pay for the personal sexual desires and habits of everybody, including women, at Georgetown Law.  Fluke reported: "Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception)."  The poor babes have to buy their own pills.  What has gone wrong with our country?  What has happened to our country where law students have to buy their own contraceptives?  What has happened to us, folks?  What have we done with our hearts?  How did we become so cruel?
How did we become so heartless? Require each other to pay for the contraceptives of the women law students at Georgetown? Sandra Fluke reported to Pelosi: "It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations. 'Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,' Fluke told the hearing. ... That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex -- and, she wants us to pay for it." Now, what does that make her? She wants us to buy her sex. She wants us to pay for her sex, and she went to a congressional committee to close the sale.
It's the right place to do that. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
Where do you think the insurance companies forced to cover this cost get the money to pay for these co-eds to have sex? It comes from health care insurance premiums that everybody else pays. There isn't anything free. "'For a lot of students, like me, who are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary,' she complains." A thousand dollars, $3,000, practically an entire summer salary that they now have to spend on sex. So she earns enough money in just one summer to pay for three full years of sex, and they're full years because she and her co-ed classmates are having sex nearly three times a day for three years straight, apparently.
Well, that's what the numbers add up to! We've run 'em here: $953 for condoms on Amazon. That's a year. That's close to a thousand bucks. Why aren't condoms provided free by this stupid policy? Why only birth control pills? No, I'm not advocating. I'm just asking the question. At $1 a condom, if she shops at CVS pharmacy's website, that $3,000 would buy her 3,000 condoms or a thousand of them a year. We've done all kinds of research on this. And what about these deadbeat boyfriends or random hookups that these babes are encountering here, having sex with nearly three times a day? While in law school.
If Fluke is gonna ask the government to force anybody to foot the bill for her friends' birth control, shouldn't it be these guys? Who pays for the abortions? Oops! We already know that, too. So that's where this all started, that story. That's where it all started. A woman who goes to law school at Georgetown goes to a congressional hearing where Pelosi is (crying), "I'm going broke having sex! I need... I need the government to provide me condoms and contraception. It's not fair." Okay, so this is a law student at a congressional committee asking for us ... to ... pay ... for ... the ... things ... that ... make ... it ... possible ... for ... her ... to ... have ... sex.
Therefore we are paying her to have sex.
Therefore we are paying her for having sex.
We are getting screwed even though we don't meet her personally!
What would you call this?
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Are we supposed to believe that it's impossible to find free condoms in Washington? And it's a good question. Where are the guys that these women at Georgetown Law are having sex with? Where's their responsibility? I mean, these guys are gonna learn (if they haven't already) they're gonna be buying a lot more for sex than just birth control pills. Why the exemption here on birth control pills? What makes birth control pills so unique that the insurance company -- government, somebody, taxpayers -- has to provide this? We all know the answer here. This allows them to talk "women's freedom," and "women's reproductive rights." But it's also the expansion of government.
Let's listen to some Sandra Fluke. By the way, did you know CBS ripped me for calling Danica Patrick "a woman driver." What is she? Is she a male driver and I've missed it? What is she? Look at what's happening to our language. I called Danica Patrick "a woman driver..." (interruption) Well, because she had said that she thinks the government is perfectly responsible in making these decisions for us; she trusts the government. I said, "Well, okay, she's a woman driver. That makes sense." What is she? Here's Sandra Fluke before this committee, the House Democrat Steering and Policy Committee Hearing on Contraception. Here's a portion of her opening remarks.
FLUKE: When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected by this lack of contraceptive coverage.
RUSH: Can you believe this?

FLUKE: Especially --
RUSH: Stop. Stop and listen to this! You'd think we're hearing about a killer disease here! You'd think we're listening to testimony about some horrible crime that's being committed! "[T]he faces of the women affected by this lack of contraceptive coverage"? Let me ask you people. When you walk down the street and you see a woman and you look at her face, can you determine whether or not she's had a birth control pill or not? Do you know whether or not she's suffering and in pain and miserable because she can't find any birth control pills? Who knows this? How do you look at the face of a woman and know that? But listen to the way this is being portrayed. It's like a terminal disease not having your birth control pill! Listen to this.
FLUKE: Last week I have heard more and more of their stories. They tell me that they have suffered financially, emotionally, and medically because of this lack of coverage. Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy.
RUSH: Ms. Fluke, have you ever heard of not having sex? Have you ever heard of not having sex so often? What next that you can't afford are you gonna go to Pelosi and say we need to buy? Mink? A Volt? A Prius? What next are you going to want, Ms. Fluke, that you see etched in misery on the faces of fellow students at Georgetown because they don't have? "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected..." Play the opening line of this again. Sound bite number four. Listen to this.
FLUKE: When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected by this lack of contraceptive coverage.
RUSH: Prove it! Stop the tape. Prove it! What is "on their faces"? Acne? What is it, acne? Zits? What's on their faces that tells you? Seriously! You know, I'm the mayor of Realville. I live in Literalville. This is hilarious. It's absolutely skyrocketing hilarious to have this portrayed as the latest killer disease (brought to you by the Republicans, of course).
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Folks, if you ask 'em -- if you ask 'em -- the Washington, DC, Department of Health will send you free condoms and lube. The DC Department of Health free condoms and lube if you just ask 'em for it! So, Ms. Fluke and the rest of you feminazis, here's the deal: If we are going to pay for your contraceptives and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. And I'll tell you what it is. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: In addition to this being Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, it's the Limbaugh Institute for Sexual Research today. Folks, do you realize that you can get, in Washington, DC...? If you ask the Department of Health there, they will send you free condoms! They will send you free condoms. You don't have to get Nancy Pelosi and ask for thousands of dollars in free birth control pills, and they'll even throw in the lube! So, if we're gonna sit here, and if we're gonna have a part in this, then we want something in return, Ms. Fluke: And that would be the videos of all this sex posted online so we can see what we are getting for our money. Now, let's go to audio sound bites. Let's listen to the congressional reaction to this 'cause they are fit to be tied; they want me drawn and quartered. First up is Barbara Boxer last night on Politics Nation, that's Reverend Sharpton's show. And Sharpton said, "What do you make of this the poison atmosphere? Like what do you make of these statements today by Rush Lumbard?" (sic)
BOXER: Rush Limbaugh has insulted and hurt every woman in America. Ninety-nine percent of women have used some form of birth control in her lifetime. So he has now said we're all just terrible human beings. And, if I was a woman who listened to Rush Limbaugh, I would turn off that... Uh, I would tune him out of my life, because I think people will be disgusted by what he said. Truly.
RUSH: Well, what did I say? I said, "If we're paying for this, it makes these women sluts, prostitutes." And what else could it be? If we are buying it. There's a couple of stories here. There's a fundraising e-mail from the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee, got it right here, and they got a picture of me that makes me look... Here, I'm gonna zoom in on the. It's a small picture. I'm gonna zoom in on the Dittocam. I'm zooming right now. I just don't want you to watch the zoom take place. I'm doing this while also speaking to you and not losing a syllable or a thought. Okay. Let me zoom a little tighter. That's it. Are you ready? Three ... two ... one.
That's the picture of me that they have posted on their letter! (laughing) Does that not look like Nosferatu? I look like Klaus Kinski in the movie Nosferatu! Okay, that's that. I'm gonna zoom back out now and get the Dittocam back -- if it'll work -- back at its normal frame. There we go. Three ... two ... one. There we go. Let me read the letter to you. "What does it say about the college co-ed Susan (sic) Fluke who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex. What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.
"'What does it say about the college co-ed [Sandra] Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex -- what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute.' I am absolutely repulsed right now. Sandra Fluke, the courageous Georgetown Law student who had the strength to stand up in Congress against Republican attacks on birth control coverage, is now under attack from the right wing. First, House Republicans refused to let [her] testify. Now, they think they can shame us into silence." They go on to ask for money. "Defeat Anti-Women Republicans. Contribute. Deadline Midnight Tonight." It's just hilarious. What...? I want to know: Ms. Fluke, who bought your condoms in junior high?
Who bought your condoms in the sixth grade, or your contraception? Who bought your contraceptive pills in high school? Wouldn't you be just as likely to go broke in high school and junior high as you would be in college? Who paid for 'em then? Ms. Fluke, because of Obamacare, you are still on your parents' insurance coverage. Why doesn't your parents' policy provide your contraception? Why do we have to? You're still a child according to Obamacare. Of course, the rest of us have had it confirmed. Al Sharpton, when he heard what I said, he said, "Resist We Much!" Sharpton was unaware. "What did Lombard say?" He said, "Resist We Much!" Here's Frank "The Lout" Lautenberg. He was on the Senate floor this morning.
LAUTENBERG: (haltingly) Yesterday we heard something astounding. Came from Rush Limbar (sic), who's a prime voice of modern conservatism in this country. What he said yesterday -- and I had it checked because I wanted to be sure that I'm not misquoting anything. Said a woman who wants affordable birth control is, and I quote here, "a prostitute." Talking about your wife, your sister, your daughter, your child. Hateful! Ugly language! And we condemn it.
RUSH: Where did he get it checked? Probably Media Matters. Of course, it's not what I said. He's forgetting the way this whole thing happened. A woman goes up to congressional committee and says: I'm having sex so damn much, I'm going broke. What the heck is going on here? This is why I tell you, it's "phony soldiers" times ten. And it's not true. Maria Cantwell, Senator from Washington, MSNBC Live this morning. The anchor said, "Rush Limbaugh yesterday squarely aimed his words at Sandra Fluke questioning her virtue..." I'm not questioning her virtue. I know what her virtue is. She's having so much sex that she's going broke! There's no question about her virtue. "Rush Limbaugh yesterday squarely aimed his words at Sandra Fluke, questioning her virtue, doing so in a pretty rude manner on the airwaves. How do you feel about her character, her virtue being questioned, and is she being treated like a political football between the parties?"
Her "virtue" is not in question. Her virtue being questioned? Who is this anchor? Thomas Roberts. Thomas, do you have any question about her virtue? Is it still an open question to you? Anyways, Maria Cantwell, here's what she said.
CANTWELL: There is no call for those kinds of comments. Those are very inappropriate, and they should be repudiated by lots of people. This is about something that women have fought for and guaranteed the right to get access.
RUSH:  I don't think it's being denied.  Contraception is not being denied, access to it. The DC Department of Health, you call 'em up, they'll send the stuff to you free.  They'll send you condoms free.  Well, we have a sound bite here about that, worried about back alley contraception.  Representative Jackie Speier, Democrat, California, this morning on the House floor.
SPEIER:  I rise this morning to say to Rush Limbaugh, shame on you.  Shame on you for being the hatemonger that you are. Shame on you for being misogynistic. Shame on you for calling the women of this country sluts and prostitutes, 'cause that's what he did.  Ninety-eight percent of the women in this country at some time in their lives use birth control, and yet he went on the air recently and called Sandra Fluke a slut and a prostitute because she was trying to access birth control pills as a third-year law student at Georgetown.  So I say to the women of this country, do something about this.  Stop supporting the hatemongering of Rush Limbaugh.
RUSH:  Right.  So again here, you see how they play this and misrepresent it.  I just find all this hilarious. (interruption) No, I've already said that.  I'd buy all these women aspirins, put 'em between their knees, like Andrea Mitchell does.  I would do that.  Who's next? Sheila Jackson Lee, we have a couple of them here.
LEE:  On the February 29th show Mr. Limbaugh repeatedly used sexually charged, offensive, obscene language to malign the character of a courageous young woman, a private citizen --
RUSH:  Stop the tape.  Courageous.  Recue that to the top.  Courageous, having so much sex she's going broke at Georgetown Law.  (laughing)  Gosh, I love this.  Pretty soon we're gonna have these women talk about how embarrassing it is to have to go to the pharmacy and not be able to pay for your birth control pills.  How embarrassing it is.  You can see the embarrassment etched on women's faces at CVS.  Oh, it is?  It is?  Who did?  What, cut five?  Where's cut five?  Sandra Fluke said it?  Oh, no!  Oh, no!  I gotta hear it.  Here.  Play it.
FLUKE:  One told us of how embarrassed and just powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter and learned for the first time that contraception was not covered on her insurance, and she had to turn and walk away because she couldn't afford that prescription.  Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception.  Just last week a married female student told me that she had to stop using contraception because she and her husband just couldn't fit it into their budget anymore.
RUSH:  Wow.  Who paid for the sex and the contraception in the backseat of the car way back when?  So it's embarrassing to go to the drugstore and not be able to pay and find out that the birth control pills are not covered by insurance.  You see embarrassment etched all over the faces.  Folks, for all the hilarity that's contained in what's going on here...  Here's a woman exercising no self-control.  The fact that she wants to have repeated, never-ending, as often as she wants it sex -- given.  No question about that.  Of course, it's normal.  Why, who are you, Limbaugh?  Where you been?  We're to pay for it, and if there's any objection to it, then there's racism, bigotry, sexism, misogyny.  We gotta killer disease out here, apparently, and that is women who can't afford contraception or don't want to pay for it, even though they can afford it.  One more Sheila Jackson Lee, then we'll finish with this.
LEE:  And so I know that I'm standing here in the face of the Fairness Doctrine that does not require any media to offer a contravening point.  I would command Rush Limbaugh to invite us on and talk about constructive ways of helping women.  I give him every opportunity to have some guest where we can call in.  I don't think that is possible, but I would challenge all the women of the House, let's try to dial that number.
RUSH:  800-282-2882.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH:  You know, folks, millions of women enjoy sex in the back of a car.  You have some women that can't afford a car.  What are we to do?  What is our solution to women who prefer sex in the backseat of a car but can't afford a car?  I've run some numbers here.  Did you notice in that sound bite Sheila Jackson Lee or Maria Cantwell or one of them talked about the strength that Sandra Fluke had to go before Congress, which is amazing.  She's having so much sex it's amazing she can still walk, but she made it up there.  It takes a lot of courage to ask for something free, folks.  Takes a lot of strength to ask for freebies, doesn't it?  I'm being facetious.  You know what the solution is here, why doesn't Georgetown lower their tuition?
Here the numbers at Georgetown right now. Georgetown law costs $45,000 per year, $20,000 for room and board, sex not included.  So tuition and room and board is 60 grand a year and this woman's up at Congress asking for thousands of dollars in birth control pills.  This college, this law school, they need to establish a new scholarship, the Wilt Chamberlain Scholarship, exclusively for women.
Rocky in Jacksonville, Florida, great to have you on the EIB Network.  Hello.
CALLER:  Hi, Rush.  I think they ought to add the cost of the birth control to their student loan and then they can be responsible and pay it off.
RUSH:  I agree.  This is a matter of personal choice.  It's an elective activity, or is it?  Maybe they're sex addicts.  I mean this is the kind of stuff, we're talking sex addict frequency here.  But that's a good point, why us?  See, that's why this is so instructive, folks.  For all the hilarity here, and there's plenty of it, the microcosm contained in this entire episode tells us everything about who we're up against.  This whole thing is a manufactured, fake issue.  Nobody is denying anybody contraception.  Nobody.  No Republican was ever suggesting that contraception be banned.  It never happened.  It wasn't being discussed by the Republicans.
George Stephanopoulos enters it into a Republican debate in New Hampshire on January 7th and this is the result.  From that one question that he asked Romney, we now have congressional hearings on how Republicans want to deny women contraception.  The Issa committee had a hearing about it all right, but it was about whether or not the president has the constitutional authority to mandate the Catholic Church or its schools or insurance companies to provide this stuff free.  He doesn't have that authority.  All of this is unconstitutional, every bit of it.
END TRANSCRIPT

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Unionization: Why?



A NYT Op-Ed piece, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/opinion/a-civil-right-to-unionize.html?_r=1,  elaborates on the authors' beliefs on why the ability to Unionize, should be a Civil Right. 

Unions stifle economic growth.  It's a simple truth.  It doesn't take a Mensa member to understand the logic. 

Widget A retails for $Z.  Widget A costs $Y to produce. The price to produce Widget A increases if unionization occurs.  Therefore increasing the retail price for Widget A.  Less consumers purchase Widget A because of the increase.  The company's profit share decreases as does its stock price.  Investors sell their shares.

Take that and multiply it by hundreds, in reality thousands, of companies.  Unions increase the cost of doing business.  It's a simple "This follows That" scenario.

I also notice that this piece uses Germany as an example of a "heavily" unionized country that is successful.  Heavy?  33.8% of Germany is unionized, and that number includes Public Unions.  That number also is shrinking, as are practically all European countries union percantages, as they struggle to compete in the modern global economy.

I write all of this and then also add this: I believe in the right to unionize.  However, I also believe in the right of a company to fire anyone, at any time, for any reason, up to and including a worker trying to unionize a company.  If you're going to play with fire, prepare to get burned.  Forcing a company to retain workers who are striking and draining a company's profit is illogical.

Unions are dinosaurs in modern, "first-world" countries.  They need to be thanked and appreciated for what they have done in the past and then put in a museum. 

Developing countries though, they are are different story.  I say inflict more unions upon them.  It will drive up their "cost of doing business" rates to where they are more in line with the first-world countries and put us on a more equal footing.

Of course then inflation increases, even more.  But that's another story.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Congrats to Ben and Jenn!

I heard that Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner just had a new baby boy and wanted to extend my congratulations. It seems a rare thing these days to hear about celebrities having kids and the parents actually be MARRIED. Good for them!

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Friday, February 24, 2012

What's a politicians most important job? Getting Re-Elected.




Great article that illustrates the political dilemma that our country faces.  The two paragraphs that are the most telling: "The minimum wage is one of the most studied economic policies. Hundreds of studies have concluded ‘that raising it destroys jobs while doing nothing to reduce poverty. One leading authority on the topic, economist David Neumark, recently observed, “Based on 20 years of research, I doubt there is ever a good time to raise the minimum wage.”  AND   "Still, the minimum-wage hike is gaining traction in both states in this election year because Democrats and Republicans in swing districts hope it’ll win them votes. Both groups are hoping to pressure Govs. Christie and Cuomo into endorsing a wage hike to strengthen their own positions with sympathetic voters."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/killer_stimulus_ScvgdRPBbq77Mr7Ej1p5qO#ixzz1nL5pnAwg


This just again shows that in regards to politicians, the overwhelming majority of them believe that their most important job is getting re-elected not supporting the people of their districts. 

We will never get out of the mire that we are in as a country, when politicians knowingly put themselves over the public good. 

Contraceptive Rant Redux

The editorial board of the Seattle Times believes that pharmacists should be COMPELLED to dispense contraceptives.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2017581754_edit24pharmacy.html


Compelled.  People are ignorant of reality when they start wanting others to be compelled to do something.  Or when they want something banned.  Or when they want something mandated.

If you compell a Pharmacist to sell something that he is morally against, where does it stop? 

This editorial mentions (in a roundabout way) that the state's interest in this is that more pregnancies could be prevented by having more access to these contraceptives.  So money, as it always does, is the root of the issue? 

If that is really the case, I say we COMPELL all people from having sex until they are 30.  At that time they should be well enough along in whatever career they choose, that if they do get pregnant they can take care of the child, without making me, a taxpayer, have to pay for the child.

When people start asking the government to compell, ban or mandate something they are taking the easy/cowards way out.  Education, education, education is the answer.  It's a slow process but it is infinitely better than forcing a change in a specific behavior.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

RIP USPS



The USPS announced today that they would be poop-canning 35,000 people. As to why the post office has turned out to be a miserable failure, the answer is simple: CONGRESS. Plain and simple, they stifled them by not allowing the post office to adjust to market conditions.

Check out this article for more on what happened and how the USPS may still be saved. Interesting reading!

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Makers and Takers: By the Numbers


                                                                                    
Makers and Takers.  50% of Americans only pay 3% of taxes.  The upper 10% pay 70 % of taxes.  And we want to increase taxes on which group???


Fair is in the eyes of the beholder

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

One thing leads to another


Now this is an interesting case. I have had experience with the "gay roommate" thing and so has Mr. Upton, so this one hits kind of close to home. Neither of us had webcams at the time, though.

My concern here is that authorities want to hold Mr. Ravi responsible for the suicide of his roommate. Sure, it was wrong of him to take video of his roommate, but at the same time it was his dorm room, too. Also, they are trying to portray the "victim" (aren't you your own victim when you kill yourself?) as being extremely shy, yet dude was combing the Internet looking for hook-ups and inviting strangers back to his dorm room. That doesn't sound very shy to me.

This whole ordeal is why I don't like the idea of a "hate crime" and what it implies. Yes, Navi is a crappy person, but at the same time I understand him not liking his roommate taking over the room for a rendezvous with a stranger. I had a straight friend in my dorm whose straight roommate did the same thing. He'd wake up at 2am to hear his roommate and some random girl going at it. To me, that is very disrespectful.

It is unfortunate what happened to Mr. Clementi and I feel sorry for the loss experienced by his family. However, I can't help but think that this young man had other mental issues if he was so quick to go throw himself off a bridge. That implies bigger problems, and I don't see how Navi can be held responsible for the independent actions of another person. Furthermore, it has already been determined that the Westboro Baptist "God Hates Fags" hate group are protected by free speech, and if they can protest friggin' military funerals then I think Navi has the right to know what's going on in his own damn room filled with his belongings. A room in a dorm is not free, either.

What I take away from all this is that if you want privacy then go somewhere private. Don't expect privacy in a room you share with someone you just met, especially if you are hooking up with someone else you just met. Like the saying goes - GET A ROOM!

Monday, February 20, 2012

About those student loans...

I disagreed with many things that the Occupy protesters wanted, but of those many issues I think the one that stood out the most was the idea of student loan forgiveness. Isn't the whole point of college to prepare yourself for a better future? If you spend four years working on a degree that doesn't help you in the workforce, then why did you keep working on that degree? That's the part I don't understand. Do people not look at the job market before they launch into a degree program? Sure, taking a bunch of art classes would be great fun, but is that really what college is for?

I chose to study computers at college because I figured everybody has one at home and at the office, and that there was money to be made there. Guess what? I was right! I have always had an interest in movies and writing, but I didn't study film or creative writing because I knew, living in South Mississippi, that I would not be able to find a job. I'm still passionate about those things, but I am also realistic about the future.

Young people today, or anyone wishing to go to college, need to seriously consider what they are working toward. Just because you want something doesn't make it a good idea. I applaud anyone who wishes to further themselves by working toward a college degree, but you better make damn sure it's worth the investment. Degrees are expensive, and unless you come from a rich family or have a husband/wife that is the bread winner, you might want to rethink that liberal arts degree and get something a bit more useful, or just learn how to fix air conditioners.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Makers vs. Takers

Check out this article from WSJ.com about how more people now work for the government (salary paid by taxes, etc) than in manufacturing. And we wonder why this country is failing.

This could not be more true, and I have seen it first hand:

"In government employment, tenure for teachers and near lifetime employment for other civil servants shields workers from this basic system of reward and punishment. It is a system that breeds mediocrity, which is what we've gotten."


In my best Monty Python voice, "Run AWAY!!! Run AWAY!!!"

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

ChiComs & Hollywood

Fan-freaking-tastic.  The ChiComs and Hollywood are in the process of forming a match made in hell.

With Hollywood looking to increase revenue streams and China sitting on revenue, Hollywood is about to become Beijing East. 

Gone or at the very least sugarcoasted will be claims that the ChiComs use slave labor, are rapidly modernizing their military, stealing our High Tech secrets like crazy, force prisoners to "donate" organs which are then sold, persecute christians and of course other religions, and etc....

The ChiComs will become the "Mr Rogers" of the world.  Not capable of doing anything wrong (or at least provable) and "helping" all of their neighbors, while wearing their cute little gray sweater.  Couple this with the knowledge that the studios either own or are owned by most of the larger mainstream media outlets a very rosy future will soon be created for them.

http://the-diplomat.com/2012/02/15/hollywood-bows-to-china-soft-power/

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Unions are killing Twinkies!

Love the Wonder Bread?  Or the unwholesome but oh so creamy goodness of a Twinkie?  Maybe for not much longer.

I'm not anti-Union in reality.  If there was a significant need for them to exist, I say fine, have fun.  BUT, if the company fires you all don't come crying to me. 
I just don't see the need for the overwhelming majority of unions that currently operate in the U.S. 

They are a parasite.  In most union/company disputes, the company can't just fire the union labor.  If they do the Labor Dept. comes after them.  So they are stuck with unioned workers who endanger the company and consequently themselves.  Again, see parasite.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/story/2012-02-13/teamsters-hostess-wonder-bread-twinkies/53081758/1?loc=interstitialskip

I have much more to say about unions but only so little time during lunch to do so.

Till another day.

Monday, February 13, 2012

POTUS Election 2012 - Can we pick teams again?

I’ve been thinking a lot about the upcoming presidential election and it bothers me just how much I don’t want to vote for any of them.

I don’t like Barrack Obama because he’s not been a good president. It has nothing to do with race or any of that crap. The man built a cabinet full of liars and crooks. He put a tax cheat over the treasury, and his AG (Eric Holder) is currently on trial for giving guns to Mexican drug runners in order to spearhead an anti-gun movement that backfired when those guns were used to kill a border patrol officer. I could go on, but that wouldn’t be necessary.

I don’t like Mitt Romney because he’s Mormon. There, I said it. I have nothing personal against Mormons, as I have some dear friends who subscribe to that religious philosophy. I think you can believe in what you want and worship however you want, but for the leader of this country I hold a higher standard. Never mind that Romney says stupid things like “I don’t care about the very poor” or that he’s had a silver spoon up his butt since birth. There are aspects of Mormonism that I think are just a bit weird, and it makes me wonder what other weird stuff he’s into. That and he doesn’t drink. At least Obama will sit down and have a beer with you.

Rick Santorum is a crazy person. The fact that he has the support that he does really scares me. Remember the whole Personhood thing that went around a while back? Part of that would require rape victims to be forced to carry the rapist’s child, even if the victim is a child herself. I hate abortion, but going that far with it is insane. It goes way too far and anyone who wishes to be POTUS ought to know better. That and he looks like Bob Saget.

Ron Paul. Oh, boy. I really want to vote for this guy, but there are some things that just don’t work for me. Can I get a moderate libertarian, please? His ideas about widespread cuts (which wouldn’t go over, anyway) are too far reaching. He’d spend most of his presidency butting heads with Congress over pretty much everything he wants to change.

If I vote for Paul, it’ll be a wasted vote because he won’t win. If he gets enough support, it could be like Ross Perot in 1992 all over again. That’s where Perot got so many votes that would probably have otherwise been Republican, and Bill Clinton won the race with only 43% of the popular vote.

I’d rather see Obama re-elected than Santorum win the election.

Mitt Romney…hmm…this might be one of those cases where I wouldn’t be so much as voting for him, but voting against Obama.

There’s still plenty of time to decide which one to choose, but if this were a restaurant I would have walked out already. Nothing on the menu looks good to me, and the prices are too high.

I've been there...have you?


I could exemplify this with screenshots of actual Facebook debates, but for now we'll just use this handy dandy graphic.

Contraception Rant

A very brief entry.

The whole Obama Healthcare Plan, contraception deal.

How the hell did it get to the point that WE, the taxpayers, are paying ANYBODY, ANYWHERE for their abortions, contraception medicine/devices, and counseling?

How does anybody even think that is a just concept?

It is easy to avoid the need for abortions and contraception needs.  DON'T HAVE SEX!!!  Whats that you say?  Deny myself my pleasure?  Deny my desires?  How dare you tell me what to do!

That is the mentality that we are dealing with.  You should be responsible for my actions because you can't tell me what to do with my body and I'm not responsible enough to make my own decisions.

Don't. Have. Sex.

Honoring Whitney Houston and the Grammy Awards

Last night, the Grammys.  I watched a whole 20 to 30 minutes of it.  Watched is defined as it was on in the background as I did other things.  I've read some about the production as well.

It does a disservice to aspiring entertainers/singers and young people in general to honor Whitney Houston.  She was a coke head.  She was once a singer, true.  But she ruined her god-given talents by abusing illegal drugs and prescription drugs. 

Did she once have a voice that could make Angels cry?  Yes indeed.

But she gave that up to live in a fantasy world that was slowly killing her.

So, I truly am not hating on her but don't look up to her and don't honor her.  By honoring her you are opening a door for aspiring musicians to say, "look at Whitney, she had a great voice.  She did some coke on the side too, it killed her, but I can handle it."

To many people look at situations like Whitney's and just see the good and don't mention or gloss over the bad.  None of us are perfect but in all honesty very few of us truly do bad things, harmful things.  Whitney did band and harmful things to herself, to her family and to her friends.

Remember her?  Sure.  Honor her? Not me.

As for the rest of the Grammys?  I'm apparently becoming old and crotchedy because I didn't like any of what I saw, whether it was country, rock, rap, r&b or whatever that Mickey Mouse thing was trying to do.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Visit your local Starbucks on Valentine's Day!

If you support the rights of gun owners, then please visit your local Starbucks on 2/14. The reason is that a bunch of anti-gun folks tried to force Starbucks corporate into creating a "no firearms allowed" policy for all their stores. The company refused, saying that they'd just stick to whatever the local laws are for those locations. The anti-gun folks threatened a boycott, so groups like the NRA (National Rifle Association) are asking members to counter the boycott by going to Starbucks on Valentine's Day and ordering something. You can get a regular 12 ounce coffee for @ $1.49, or splurge and get a mocha frappuccino for @ $4.50. Their blueberry scones are to die for.

Click here to learn more about the boycott and the pro-gun response to it.

P.S. Yes, the group putting on his boycott has an actual name, but I refuse to mention it here. They aren't getting any free publicity from this blog.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Fair and Free: How I dislike these two words

Here's a post I recently wrote on Facebook.  Words have meaning, to many people overlook the most basic of concepts.


"Fair". I can't exactly describe just how much I detest the word. "Fair" is never fair. It is a word created to make those with little willpower or strength feel better about themselves. Fairness is subjective. It is not equal. True equality is what we should strive for. Another word and concept that is quickly heading up my list of intensely disliked thinks is, "free".
There. Is. Nothing. Free. Everything has a cost. How people don't understand that, baffles me.
I just heard an audio segment on NPR of our President's announcement today on his backtracking on the Contraception mandate for his health care overhaul. He stressed that contraception, etc.. would be "free". I bring up this audio bite not to hammer the president but as a useful illustration. If something is produced, manufactured, distributed, planned, designed, had any time spent on it at all. It COSTS something. A PRICE for whatever it is will be PAID by someone, somewhere. Nothing is ever free. A price is always paid, often by those who buy into the notion that they are getting something free.

Welcome

Greetings all. Mr Fulks and I have been friends for approximately 25 years.  He and I have had many of the same experiences, some of them shared together, that have helped shape our views.  But we do differ on many issues and I look forward to seeing where our views diverge.  

A little about me.

I love politics and I hate politics.
I look at the Republican and Democrats as two Corporations fighting for control of the same pie.  With that viewpoint, I am never disappointed when I see a pol in one party or the other, support something that is not beneficial to our Republic.  Politicians are in the business to get themselves reelected.  There secondary goal is do see their comrades-in-arms reelcted.  Their third goal is to serve their constituency.  I write this in a general sense as there are some politicians that I believe are actually in it for the people who they represent.  But they are in the extreme minority.

I have voted for both R's and D's in my life.  I consider myself conservative, with a lot of libertarian leanings.  Being a conservative I do tend to vote Republican and of all the politicians out there I do tend to identify with them the most.  However, just having an R behind your name means little. 

Actions do indeed, speak louder than words.

As for the matters that Mr. Fulks mentioned I stand with him on most all points.  I do divulge from some of his views though.  A few of those divergences: Gay Marriage- Homosexuals can and should have all of the same rights as do married heterosexuals.  However, to me, Marriage is a sacrament and therefore is something that a church conducts.  The vast majority of christian churches don't look favorably upon homosexual marriage.  Equality is what needs to be reached so since the state wants to be involved in the union between two individuals, perhaps they should get out of the marriage business and get into the civil union business.  Leave Marriage to churches.  Foreign Policy- There exists a fine line between policing the world and supporting our interests in the present and in the future.  One of my main issues with Ron Paul is his belief to retreat from our foreign bases.  In what universe does that make sense?  We have spent blood and treasure to secure those bases.  Bases that will keep our military fighting on other people's land when the next inevitable major war starts.  We save more lives and save more money by haviing foreign bases.

Those are a few thougts to kick things off with.

Friday, February 10, 2012

Hello and welcome

Consider this the opening salvo of our fiery political blog. Rather than harp on a topic, I'm going to introduce myself and tell you where I stand on many topics. I figure that most of the people who read this are doing so because they know either me or Mr. Upton, but maybe eventually this blog might gain some enough momentum to pick up a few strangers. In that case, here's a little about me.

Since turning 18, I have voted for both Republicans and Democrats. At this point in my 36 years of existence, I find myself torn between the distinctions of "liberal" and "conservative" because I don't know what those words mean any more. I am certainly no Democrat, though some of my opinions fall in line with the party of the ass. I have become quite disenfranchised with what the elephant party has become since the first Bush, and so I don't consider myself a Republican, either. I guess that makes me a Libertarian. Rather than try to figure out one catch-all label, I'll just tell you what I think about "the issues" and you can decide where my alliances fall.

My name is Bill Fulks and this is where I stand on the following matters:

Gun Control - This is the very first thing I look at in any candidate. If you are anti-gun in any way, I will never vote for you. I firmly believe in one's right to self preservation and protection, and any politician who thinks that disarming someone will make them safer is not somebody I want in office.

Immigration - I have nothing against anyone from any country who wants to come here and work or start a new life. Technically, we are all descended from immigrants in one way or another. There is, however, a process by which someone rightly enters the country and becomes a citizen. If you wish to bypass this process, it makes me highly suspicious of your intentions. Furthermore, if you can't speak or read English and have no driver's license or insurance, I do not want to share the road with you.

Gay Marriage - I support it. I used to not support it, but I have had many discussions about it (sometimes with real life gay people!) and came to the conclusion that it's a civil rights issue. That and the divorce rate in this country makes any argument about the "sanctity of marriage" a friggin' joke. People just need to get over their bias.

Health Care - I think we are all obligated, as human beings, to try and prevent another person from dying. There is a big difference between saving a life and providing free health care. Right now, no hospital is going to turn someone away for an emergency. That would be cruel. However, it would also be cruel to force a medical professional ( who spent years training for a very specific job) to provide free services beyond life saving techniques. Nobody should be forced to work for free just because they know a lot about a certain profession. Trust me, I know about this because I work on computers for a living. No, I will not help you get rid of the virus you got from looking at porn sites. Look at how the post office is managed or the way Hurricane Katrina was handled in New Orleans, and that should be proof enough that you do not want to put the government in charge of your health care.

Marijuana - I think the government should legalize and then tax the hell out of it. Alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana. Stop the prohibition. Let the DEA focus on the stuff that can kill you like cocaine, heroin, meth, and so on.

Foreign Policy - I don't think the United States should police the world. We are still an economic superpower, but I worry that we're spreading ourselves too thin. I also think that we should never have meddled in the affairs of the middle east. People in that area have been killing each other since before Jesus walked among them and even he couldn't straighten them out. We also need to quit creating so many millionaire shieks by not buying any more of their oil.

That's enough for now. Come back later for more, if you dare.